The Kaspersky interface and automation features are easy to use, while BitDefender gets the edge of overall detection rate and laboratory test results, but with a somewhat difficult learning curve.
Cyber ​​security threats have become the biggest concern for businesses of all sizes. These security threats are often more difficult to identify than in the past, making OpSec engineers a much more difficult task to solve.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and BitDefender Gravitzone Business Security are two of the most powerful endpoint detection and response tools in the world. Both of these EDR software solutions provide powerful detection, removal and threat management tools. Below we will look at the similarities between Kaspersky and BitDefender and where each product is ahead of the other.
Views: Mobile device security policy (TekriPublic Premium)
Jump:
What is Kaspersky?
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business An EDR suite designed for small and large businesses who need a scalable solution for OpSec requirements. With a focus on automation and automated tasks, Kaspersky shines in a small environment where stuffing may not be available to dedicate to each task.
Users often note that the console interface is easy to use as one of the best in the industry, requiring a very short learning curve to be able to get the most out of it.
What is Bitdefender?
BitDefender GravityZone Business Security SecOps looks to fulfill the same role as Kaspersky by offering a complete EDR solution ready for professionals. While boasting a laboratory detection score higher than Kaspersky’s in tests like MITRE, which mimics a state-sponsored cyber attack, BitDefender is often considered a bit more advanced in its detection techniques.
With the goal of a more complete SecOps, installation with BitDefender can be more complicated. While Kaspersky doesn’t focus on automation, BitDefender offers more flexibility and customization for groups that have the manpower to take advantage of it.
Kaspersky vs. BitDefender: feature comparison
| Features | Kaspersky | BitDefender |
|---|---|---|
| Dashboard console | Yes | Yes |
| On-premises, cloud and hybrid consoles | Yes | Yes |
| Lockdown mode | Yes | No. |
| Automatic sandbox | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic IOC detection and remedy | Yes | No. |
| Machine learning detection | Yes | Yes |
Head to Head Comparison: Kaspersky vs. BitDefender
Dashboard Control Console
Both Kaspersky and BitDefender offer detailed dashboard consoles for accessing all features and configurations for both devices. Kaspersky uses Kaspersky Security Center. This dashboard is a favorite among users with its simplicity of view and easy-to-learn interface and layout. This is great for small businesses or for those who do not have dedicated staff to handle more complex equipment.
BitDefender also offers a dashboard console, but it is certainly more complex than Kaspersky’s offer and users often think it is one of the low points of the software. It is very capable, but it has a steep learning curve and it is not intuitive or straightforward at first glance. For this reason, it is best suited for those large businesses that have dedicated staff to explore its subtleties.
Installation
Both of these options are relatively simple for SaaS tools and deployments, but users have reported that BitDefender is the easiest of the two. Although easy to use once, Kaspersky is a bit slow to deploy in the first place in most situations, according to many Secups engineers who have experience with both.
BitDefender offers most of the features out of the box, while Kaspersky has a slightly more feature-heavy model with tiered modules and prices for different functionality. This can make it difficult for small businesses to determine exactly what they need to configure for a new installation.
Identification and remedy
Kaspersky allows users to set automatic parameters and actions for various identification and other threats. This can reduce a lot of work stress for employees who do not have a dedicated team or do not want their efforts to flow.
BitDefender doesn’t offer the same level of automation, but they do offer vulnerability management that can test trends and history across networks to identify vulnerabilities. It can help speed up the work associated with cybersecurity audits and threat management.
Choosing between Kaspersky and BitDefender
Both of these EDR options are well tested and very capable for almost any size business. They identify a wide range of threats and offer dynamic options for quickly addressing those threats.
The differences are mostly in the user interface between the two, Kaspersky clearly leaning towards small to medium sized businesses without the need for dedicated staff to fully manage the software. Their automation tools also help to work towards this simpler EDR management approach.
BitDefender on the other hand is much more comfortable in the hands of dedicated Secups engineers where somewhat tougher interfaces and enhanced features can be fully exploited.
