Elon Musk’s Specter — and his will-buying — loom at Twitter’s shareholder meeting

0
73

[ad_1]

ELone Musk did not speak at Wednesday’s annual meeting of Twitter shareholders, and he did not say anything about it on Twitter. But, God, the man is still growing day by day. Musk Musk – This is a powerful thing.

The National Center for Public Policy Research, a conservative think tank, and the centre’s executives made emotional comments about the ideas, from the two shareholder proposals.

One called on Twitter to conduct an audit of its diversity efforts, which the right-leaning group says has gone too far and is now discriminating against men and whites. The other asked Twitter to publish a review of its lobbying efforts, which the center probably thought would show a generous bias on the part of the company.

A spokesman for the think tank said, “Let’s get rid of the DEI Mind virus that has spread inside Twitter. He addressed his remarks directly to Musk and referred to Musk’s recent Similar worded comments About a “Week Mind Virus”. By that, Mask means he thinks it’s foolish for companies to rush into increased awareness of social justice over the last few years.

Shareholders have rejected both proposals from the National Center for Public Policy Research, but the proposals have not really been discussed. The point is, they sit in the meeting! They were not on the initial agenda. They had a pair of late entries after announcing his takeover plans for the Musk Company, which, of course, he now says he has taken a break from, and his complaints about the business, which sounds like the voice of the national center. Public Policy Research. Proposals tell who they are talking to and who they are supporting. He may say that he wants Twitter to be politically neutral, but there is nothing politically neutral about the proposals that his name-testing guys have put forward. Rather, they are deeply conservative. In the end, they are a helpful reminder that the politics of the mask is really a duck-like scene, where their underlying meaning is most important.

You will see Musk’s presence again when Twitter tried to re-elect current director Egan Durban, co-CEO of Silver Lake. Durban joined the board in 2020 when a different employee at another Twitter company narrowly escaped investor interest. Durban and musk buds. Durban and the only person Musk spoke to before his now infamous tweet about taking Tesla private in 2018; Three days later, Durban came to Musk’s house to talk about the options for securing their funds, and Musk said he had already secured them.

Twitter shareholders voted against Durban’s re-election, suggesting they were a little tired of the mask and could not get one of his top allies back. It may also suggest that they are ISS, a research organization whose reports often influence the outcome of shareholder meetings. The ISS has advised shareholders to reject Durban but not because of its mask connection. Instead, the ISS case revolves around the fact that Durban is a busy man. He sits on five corporate boards — Dell, Intelsat, Motorola, WME, and Twitter — which means Twitter receives the most split attention from Durban alone, which must be conducting investment activities behind the $ 79 billion-in-asset Silver Lake. A lot is going on! And with everything on Twitter, maybe shareholders have made clever calls.

And again, these would mean that you have to spend for these processes. Since the Twitter regime currently operates, managers serve stunned terms. This means that an outside investor (like a muskrat) cannot enter the city and replace the board in one fell swoop, since only a handful of directors stand for election each year. (In some companies, each director stands for election each year.) The outside investor (like Musk) will have to hang on for years to fully recover the board. You may have read Twitter shareholders’ decision to cancel this move as a signal that they have done so with Musk and are losing interest in his bid. At the very least, this indicates that they are not interested in an activity that would be like removing a deadbolt from a front door. That way of entry is easy সহজ it’s easy to advance a takeover bid for a mask (or someone like that in the future).

(Now, very quickly, here are the shareholders’ approvals at the meeting: Two proposals that Twitter needs to document: how it uses confidentiality clauses, a strategy to silence outgoing employees, and a semi-annual report on how its corporate funding can influence elections. Opposed both measures.)

Officially, CEO Parag Agarwal and other Twitter executives declined to talk about Mask or the deal, which Musk said is now a “hold” for concerns about misinterpreting Twitter about spam accounts. Although they got a big opportunity through the Q&A department of the meeting without asking anything. And of course, one investor, innocently enough, asked what would happen if a public shareholder’s stock in a company was bought and taken private. No! Twitter executives said they could not even talk about it. (Answer: Shareholders will no longer own them! If Mask is purchased, they will receive a check for শেয়ার 54.20 per share in the mail. Unless they are a larger, larger shareholder, say, Prince Alwaleed. And then Kasturi will completely hang on to those shares.) Because he wants extra big investors to join him in this crazy takeover, reducing how much of his Tesla fortune will be associated with it.)

Sometime in the future, we may go through this practice again by calling another shareholder meeting to vote on the purchase of masks for Twitter investors. (Officially, this would be called a “special shareholder meeting”, since the company does not necessarily want to do an annual thing.) But if they don’t, and we get another shareholder meeting, the mask won’t be some wandering shadow. That will be the main event.

[ad_2]

Source link