The hashtags #BoycottPepsi and #BoycottWalmart were trending on Twitter on Tuesday morning.
Getty
The hashtags #BoycottPepsi and #BoycottWalmart were trending on Twitter on Tuesday morning – and for very different reasons. In the case of the world’s largest retailer, the boycott was called for when it was announced that Quebec stores would require buyers who do not have vaccination proofs to be taken to pharmacies by their partners; When the soft drink maker found a goal to boycott itself after revealing the name of the company in a report listed for funding the Texas Republican Party.
Such calls for boycotts have certainly increased in recent years due to social media, but the effectiveness may be questionable. The Coffee House announced last week that its 228,000 employees would no longer need to be vaccinated against Covid-19 and that it did not appear to affect Starbucks much.
“It’s especially easy to get caught up in the subtleties of social media,” explains Jason Molica, a professor at the American University School of Communication. “A lot of people have a grievance, and they publicly express their grievances on social media. We see it through politics, sports and entertainment. We’ve seen calls to boycott a film because some fans didn’t like the casting or simply the way the film ended. These boycott calls Has become part of the noise. “
History of boycott
The idea of ​​a boycott existed long before the word was coined. The most successful may be the boycott of American British products before the American Revolution.
However, during the 19th century Irish “Land Wars” the actual word entered the English dictionary and was named after one. Captain Charles Boycott, an agent for a missing landlord. Attempts to evict tenants were met with protests and then social exclusionism after a year-long boycott of the 1880 boycott. No one would do business for him or her, even the postmen refused to deliver his mail. He had to hire workers from different counties just to harvest his crops. And despite all this happening Long Before the age of social media, the story went “viral” – and it was picked up by remote newspapers New York Tribune, Which began to describe organized separatism as a “boycott.”
Over the next century and a half, there were significant boycotts, including the US-led boycott of the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow and the Soviet-led boycott of the 1984 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles and, of course, calls for investment. South Africa under apartheid.
#Boycott losing their teeth?
Social media has certainly made it easier for such organized boycotts, but at the same time, these can actually be counterproductive when it comes to calls with such regularity.
“When you see people asking other users on social media to boycott Starbucks, Pepsi or Walmart, hopefully this will start a big movement,” said Molika. “But the only way to really measure whether it makes a difference is whether people actually stop spending their money on those brands. In general, even after these hashtags go viral, what we see is that there really isn’t much behind them. “
One reason is that there is a lot of noise on social media. Boycott hashtags that receive thousands of retweets are quickly overwhelmed by the next big thing.
“These calls are over,” Malika admits. “But there are plenty of examples where boycotts have worked in the age of social media.”
The most significant social media-driven boycott took place last April. The platforms were not used to spread the call for a boycott but were aimed at depriving the public. In response to the lack of action on online abuse, British sports teams, athletes and leading sports organizations have announced they will take part in a three-day boycott of Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.
“When you have a lot of clubs and athletes, as well as a lot of high profile brands participating, it can make a difference,” Molika added.
This explains why these constant and unorganized efforts usually come and go so quickly.
“The latest #BoycottPepsi needle won’t move too much,” said Molika. “Without it being part of a larger movement, hashtags simply won’t work.”
A PepsiCo spokesman responded to this reporter by clarifying his donation:
In the years leading up to the presidential election, PepsiCo has generally given grants in support of both the Democratic and Republican conventions in several states. In the summer of 2020, we donated to both Texas Democrats and Republicans to support those state conventions. Republican checks were not processed until August 2021. As a result, the grant was then recorded and disclosed in a recent filing. No more grants have been made to any political party in the state of Texas since 2020. In contrast any report is incorrect.
