The new version of Riven is better than Myst

Its new version The second part of Raven: Myst It was revealed this week by the developers of the original game. It strikes a great balance between entertainment and novelty and is a huge success if you play with it for a few hours.

mysterious It was the early CD era classic that most people remember, but for me it was the sequel. torn, was the highlight of the affair. After that, the value of the sequence decreases. Performance was top notch in the second year.

He was certainly more ambitious than that the fog. Instead of a handful of densely populated park worlds, it offers a unique, integrated world that in some ways feels alive and steeped in history. mysterious They can’t keep up.

Attractive offer

This was thanks to the outstanding artistic direction and distinctive musical score.

Overall, the remake manages to achieve both. Although the original game was similar to the first game, mysterious Where you had to click to switch between still images and explore the game world and the new version follows the 2020 version. mysterious Remake (and the often forgotten 2000). But Nebel) giving the player full action like a contemporary first-person puzzle game outlet, the witnessor The Talos principleSince it’s easy to recreate many of the original camera angles this way, it would have been nice to have the option to control the game the way you did, but I can understand why it wasn’t a priority.

As it happens, today’s graphics hardware does a great job of reproducing previously static images in full 3D. (There’s also VR support, though I haven’t tried it yet.) The music is still as good as ever.

There are only two problems with presentation. First, I’ve heard that users of older hardware may have difficulty getting satisfactory accuracy and performance. I played the game on a MacBook Pro M1 Max and a Windows 11 desktop PC with an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X processor and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 graphics card. The MacBook Pro runs the game at about 30 frames per second at maximum settings and at its native laptop resolution. Desktop 4K did the same at 120 frames per second. However, since both are modern, advanced devices, results may vary.

Second, the fully animated video performances of the original game were completely replaced with 3D video game characters. It’s a necessary concession, but I think some of the characters are wasted. However, they did a pretty good job of replicating the movements of the original videos.