Pavel Durav responds to criticism of Russian nationalists over alleged privacy breaches by Telegram Premium’s voice-to-text functionality
Telegram Premium This, of course, has caught the general attention of the network, and as is often the case, excessive noise has brought to the fore some of the issues that are being discussed. Instant messaging app subscription service – we explained to you in this article How to buy Telegram Premium for 3.99 Euros per month – In fact, Russia has been accused of violating privacy and its effectiveness is at the center. Voice-to-textWhich lets you convert a vowel into an audio text.
According to some, this function is very convenient in the context in which it is impossible to hear the voice message, it will work in violation of data privacy, because such messages will be sent Google For processing and conversion into written text. It raises the noise of Russian users snaker4Who noticed a section insert in the service Telegram Premium Specifies the voice-to-text function (precisely recommended as an exclusive of the subscription program), which will specify GoogleAn affiliate of Alphabet.
Pavel Durav: “Google Voice-to-Text Converts Voice Messages to Text”
The news raised the noses of users considering their “de-googled” nature Telegram, For this reason acclaimed by many geeks and beyond. These allegations did not dispel the founder TelegramPavel Durv, who has spoken out strongly against them, overcoming suspicions of privacy breaches.
That’s what Durv wanted to mention Telegram does not share Users’ personal data such as name, IP address and telephone number through Google. According to the founder of the platform, No information is sent to third parties To whom the information refers without explicit consent from the owner. Durov explains that the audio data stream was sent to Google for processing Remains anonymous And the Company may not use this information for advertising purposes in addition to any of its other services.
In short, the media mounted by Russian nationalists is an archival problem despite the controversy.
